On Friday 10 August 2012, you wrote: > So rephrasing it: > > My current proposal is to re-interpret the filename > > "1:name" > > as not refering to drive 1 on/in the current device but rather as > refering to device 1. To my understanding this cannot cause any issue > with filenames because "1:" would have been treated by the device > specially anyway. > > The obvious restricting is that it isn't possible anymore to refer to > drive 1 this way anymore. To do this one would have to use > > "8:1:name" > > which would refer to drive 1 on/in device 8. sounds overengineered to me to be honest. since the drive number is handled by the drive on its own anyway, just ignore it. (and a PET user would be probably indeed expect to be able to use something like "1:foo" to specify drive 1 in a filename) -- http://www.hitmen-console.org http://magicdisk.untergrund.net http://www.pokefinder.org http://ftp.pokefinder.org Knowing what to optimize matters as much as knowing how to optimize. Otherwise, you'll optimize the wrong thing, and end up with really fast slow code. <Michael Abrash> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Fri Aug 10 19:28:20 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-08-10 19:28:24 CEST