Re: [cc65] Filenames for POSIX functins on CBM targets

From: Groepaz <groepaz1gmx.net>
Date: 2012-08-10 19:29:26
On Friday 10 August 2012, you wrote:
> So rephrasing it:
> 
> My current proposal is to re-interpret the filename
> 
> "1:name"
> 
> as not refering to drive 1 on/in the current device but rather as
> refering to device 1. To my understanding this cannot cause any issue
> with filenames because "1:" would have been treated by the device
> specially anyway.
> 
> The obvious restricting is that it isn't possible anymore to refer to
> drive 1 this way anymore. To do this one would have to use
> 
> "8:1:name"
> 
> which would refer to drive 1 on/in device 8.

sounds overengineered to me to be honest. since the drive number is handled by 
the drive on its own anyway, just ignore it. (and a PET user would be probably 
indeed expect to be able to use something like "1:foo" to specify drive 1 in a 
filename)

-- 

http://www.hitmen-console.org    http://magicdisk.untergrund.net
http://www.pokefinder.org        http://ftp.pokefinder.org

Knowing what to optimize matters as much as knowing how to optimize. 
Otherwise, you'll optimize the wrong thing, and end up with really fast slow 
code. 
<Michael Abrash>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Fri Aug 10 19:28:20 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-08-10 19:28:24 CEST