Re: [cc65] Filenames for POSIX functins on CBM targets

From: Groepaz <groepaz1gmx.net>
Date: 2012-08-10 18:22:35
On Friday 10 August 2012, you wrote:
> Hi
> 
> >> The only thing we loose is the possiblity to specify a drive
> >> name without also specifying a unit name.
> > 
> > that would be extremely horrible though. specifying the unit name is VERY
> > uncommon. most c64 people, who didnt use a PET before, dont even know it
> > can be done :)
> 
> Sorry for being unprecise. My statement above should rather have read:
> 
> The only thing we loose is the possiblity to specify a drive _number_
> without also specifying a unit _number_.

that only makes it slightly less annoying and unusual :)

-- 

http://www.hitmen-console.org    http://magicdisk.untergrund.net
http://www.pokefinder.org        http://ftp.pokefinder.org

Nen Assembler ist wie nen Hund. der macht alles was man ihm sagt. Compiler 
sind wie Katzen. 
<jmpfce2>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Fri Aug 10 18:22:06 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-08-10 18:22:09 CEST