Hello, * On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 02:10:04PM +0200 A.Fachat wrote: > For example > open("8#0:name", ... Note that open("#0", ...) is perfectly legal for the 1541 (opening a specific buffer). Thus, using the "#" is not completely unproblematic. Also: What if there would be no drive number? Should open("8#name") be valid, too? The double colon syntax proposes elsewhere is also not unproblematic. Look at the following syntaxes: - 8:0:name - 8:@0:name (yes, overwrite-with-at is problematic, I know...) - 8:@name Also: devices 0 and 1 normally do not exist on the IEC bus; however, screen (0) and tape (1) are valid targets for open(), too, aren't they? Thus, distinguishing between device and drive in "n:name" with n < 2 or not is not an option, either. Regards, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://www.trikaliotis.net/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Fri Aug 10 16:25:00 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-08-10 16:25:03 CEST