Hello Uz, * On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:09:28PM +0200 Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > > Hi! > > On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 01:29:57PM +0200, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > > Thus, it seems rule #1 was added in 2.13.9 compared to 2.13.3 (or was > > the order of #1 and #2 changed?). Wouldn't it make more sense to > > completely remove rule #2 then? This way, it would seem more consistent > > to me. > > Yes, you might be right here. I will check that. Thanks for r5802 and r5803. I works now as I expected. > > Even worse, even --forget-inc-paths does not change anything on #1 and > > #2, only on #3. So, one cannot prevent rule #2 from happening. > > --forget-inc-paths will only remove the compiled-in paths; nothing that is > added later. Ok, that makes sense. Regards, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://www.trikaliotis.net/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Mon Aug 6 21:13:17 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-08-06 21:13:21 CEST