On 2012-07-07, at 15:56, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: >>> The cbm_k_ functions are more or less direct entries for the kernal calls. >> >> Are those - BTW - documented? I found: >> >> http://www.cc65.org/snapshot-doc/c128-4.html#ss4.2 >> >> which says "See the function reference for declaration and usage." >> >> but they are not listed in the function reference.. > > This is work to be done. I've asked for contributions several times, but apart > from the "usual" suspects (Oliver, Stefan Haubenthal, ...) no one else > volunteered. So docs are written when I have the time, which is usually when > I'm too tired to do serious coding. I see... I took the hit and augmented funcref.sgml with all cbm_k_ funtions I found in cbm.h. Let me know if you are OK with what I did there. Regards. -- SD!---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Mon Jul 9 21:27:50 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-07-09 21:27:54 CEST