Hi! On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 06:47:18PM +0300, thefox xofeht wrote: > Thanks for the workaround, it should do for now! However, there seems > to be a bug in the linker: That was actually a bug in the assembler, and it was easier to move evaluation of the argument for .BANK into the linker than to fix the assembler problems. So, your original code should work when using the next snapshot. Be sure to delete all object files, since the internal format has changed. Please let me know if there are any problems. One minor thing is already known: The diagnostics in case of problems are not very good. If you use .BANK and there's something wrong, the linker won't tell you the exact location of the problem. I might fix that in the future. Thanks for testing and the reports! Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sat Jun 30 19:23:01 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-06-30 19:23:05 CEST