Re: [cc65] Common macros for dirent.d_type

From: Groepaz <>
Date: 2012-06-26 17:58:21
On Tuesday 26 June 2012, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:25:08PM +0200, Oliver Schmidt wrote:
> > I understand that i.e. on CBMs not all "regular" files are equal
> > ( but at least that's
> > the general idea.
> Which brings up a question I planned to ask earlier but forgot about it:
> Should CBM relative files be classified as "regular"? I think they can be
> opened using open() but need special handling later, so while they classify
> as "something with data in it", it might not be of much use.

before you even think about REL files (i would ignore them, nothing uses them 
anyway) - what about using the much much much MUCH more common PRG for regular 
files instead of this USR thing? 99,999% of all real existing files cant be 
opened (without hacking in a change to use PRG) right now at all =)


Wozu Socken? Sie schaffen nur Löcher. 
<Albert Einstein>

To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Tue Jun 26 17:58:12 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-06-26 17:58:15 CEST