On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:35:12PM -0500, Payton Byrd wrote: > Are there any practical limits to the complexity and size of linker config > files? Not as far as I know. > I have a huge config file and some really strange things are > starting to happen such as methods being left out of binaries. You mean, one single function is missing? I cannot really imagine that the linker causes a behaviour like this. I would suggest checking the makefile if the object file in question is actually linked in, then check the map file if the linker says it's really there. If you're linking an object file explicitly which is missing according the map file, then please contact me in private mail with a code sample. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Tue Jun 12 08:57:47 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-06-12 08:57:50 CEST