On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 09:20:57AM +0200, Johan Kotlinski wrote: > Hi, just one thought here. When I make a loop like this: > > for (char* ptr = 0xd800; ptr != 0xdbe8; ++ptr) { ... } > > ...the check for exit condition will be done MSB first. I.e., it would > compare with 0xdb before comparing 0xe8. > > Wouldn't it be so much more efficient if it checks LSB first? Roughly > MSB will match one out of four times, while LSB only matches one out > of 256 times. So those second checks could be avoided a lot of times. Ok, but what is with for (I = 0x0000; I != 0xFF00; I += 0x100) { ... } In this case comparing LSB is useless, because the condition is never true. What I want to say is that it depends heavily on the actual circumstances, which strategy is better. I will have a more thoroughful look at it when I'm at home again. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Mon Apr 2 10:59:18 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-04-02 10:59:21 CEST