On 2012-03-27 23:53, Christopher Pow wrote: > > Right now I'm doing it all with blocking QTcpSocket calls in a worker > thread, which is annoying because I have to block for about 1 second > in order to keep up. Once I get the commands down that I need to use > to support the IDE functionality, I'll spend more time working on the > asynchronous QTcpSocket implementation, which should be much faster. > But, having said that, I did notice that it takes quite a long time to > get results for "m $0 $ffff" =]. Perhaps I'll have to make the > memory dump smarter somehow. > Shared memory ? a bit like the MITSHM framebuffer sharing option in VICE ? Some years ago I started extending VICE with a shared memory mapping option that would enable external applications to peek (and poke) into the emulated memory map - but never finished the job... /Uffe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed Mar 28 11:17:48 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-03-28 11:17:52 CEST