On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:11:23PM +0100, Johan Kotlinski wrote: > Ah, so that's how it is supposed to work. I already had the > expectation that they were addresses, so I declared them as char > pointers... but when I think of it, declaring as char of course is the > simplest way to do things from compiler+linker view. Even if a bit > counter-intuitive :) You could even declare them as void (a cc65 extension). But declaring the as chars has the advantage, that taking the address results in a char pointer, so address calculations use "bytes" even when not casting the pointers to an int. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed Jan 4 22:38:52 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2012-01-04 22:38:55 CET