Hi Uz, * On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 03:13:34PM +0100 Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 02:28:22PM +0100, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: [...] > Won't work. Here is an example: [...] > Result is 8 bit wide, but wrong if the NOT operator just works on the low > byte. Good point. That's the reason you are working on the cc65 package, and not me. ;) > > Despite this: Would you accept a patch that tries to introduce this > > behaviour (making the creation of a viable patch my problem again, not > > yours?) > > If you come up with a solution that works with aritrary expressions and > doesn't mess up the existing code then yes, I would be glad about such a > patch. But I doubt that such a solution is possible given that expressions can > be quite complex and could involve macros or pseudo functions. Yes, I see (now). I did not see the full potential of problems that can arise. > I'm not sure how much work it is, since this new type has to be passed to the > linker via the object file. Although it looks like a fine solution, I don't like that it will possibly introduce more work than I expected for this. Furthermore, it introduces the potential for new errors. Thus, I would say: Although I'd like to have it, I doubt it will be worth the effort... So, I will go and try to fix my sources. ;) > I wish anybody on the list a happy new year! Same here. And especially for you, thank you for your continuous work and support on cc65! Regards, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://opencbm.sf.net/ http://www.trikaliotis.net/ http://vice-emu.sf.net/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sat Dec 31 21:09:34 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2011-12-31 21:09:38 CET