Re: [cc65] bitwise not broken in ca65?

From: Spiro Trikaliotis <>
Date: 2011-12-29 13:32:00

* On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 01:01:39AM +0100 Groepaz wrote:
> On Saturday 24 December 2011, you wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-12-24 at 14:41 +0100, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > This is caused by an error in older ca65 versions which has been fixed
> > > recently. So old code exploiting the behaviour does no longer work.
> > 
> > Thanks Uz, nice explanation.
> > 
> > Im not sure who is maintaining opencbm at the moment - if I come across
> > it Ill let them know.
> spiro is ... lets say hosting it =)


I will fix it ASAP (as soon as I have compiled ca65 so I know exactly
which places are affected).

BTW: Uz, was this expected behaviour ever documented? Somehow, I do not
like the new one (obviously).

The term "old code *exploiting* the behaviour" is something that hints
that people writing that code would have had at least the possibility to
know that it was not meant this way.

I expect an option to force the old behaviour is out of reach? (For me,
not only OpenCBM is affected, but also other code.)


Spiro R. Trikaliotis                                
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Thu Dec 29 13:32:22 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2011-12-29 13:32:26 CET