Hello, * On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 01:01:39AM +0100 Groepaz wrote: > On Saturday 24 December 2011, you wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-12-24 at 14:41 +0100, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > This is caused by an error in older ca65 versions which has been fixed > > > recently. So old code exploiting the behaviour does no longer work. > > > > Thanks Uz, nice explanation. > > > > Im not sure who is maintaining opencbm at the moment - if I come across > > it Ill let them know. > > spiro is ... lets say hosting it =) bla.... I will fix it ASAP (as soon as I have compiled ca65 so I know exactly which places are affected). BTW: Uz, was this expected behaviour ever documented? Somehow, I do not like the new one (obviously). The term "old code *exploiting* the behaviour" is something that hints that people writing that code would have had at least the possibility to know that it was not meant this way. I expect an option to force the old behaviour is out of reach? (For me, not only OpenCBM is affected, but also other code.) Regards, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://opencbm.sf.net/ http://www.trikaliotis.net/ http://vice-emu.sf.net/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Dec 29 13:32:22 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2011-12-29 13:32:26 CET