On 2011-12-11, at 18:13, Groepaz wrote: > On Sunday 11 December 2011, you wrote: >> Sorry, but IMHO the "cleanest" ways should be used in "real life" programs. >> I was already getting enough disappointments with so called "fast loaders" >> still back in the days as they were causing my setup work slow and >> unreliable when compared to DolphinDOS. > > ofcourse. i am not saying that you shouldnt use kernal loading - thats > ofcourse the preferred way to do things, especially when talking about > tools/applications. BUT i would always recommend to use cbm_load over > fopen/fread, The above is of course valid as long as we stick to CBM targets. And yes, the original question was about CBM. I guess it's me who tend to always think "portable" whenever cc65/C code on 6502/6510 is being spoken about. Maybe because for a 64 I feel as good (if not better :-) with pure assembler.. Thus - yes, as long as we speak of CBM only it's all correct. -- SD! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Mon Dec 12 00:46:49 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2011-12-12 00:46:52 CET