Re: [cc65] Goodies Made with cc65?

From: Gábor Lénárt <>
Date: 2011-12-04 16:28:57
On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 03:36:20PM +0100, Groepaz wrote:
> > I havae a question: The ttile says "Applications written in C or
> > C/assembler" so does that mean that pure assembler applications (using
> > ca65 / ld65) do not qualify for this list?
> > 
> > - If yes then VM02 needs to be removed.
> > 
> > - No no then IP65 should be added.
> IMHO pure asm projects are not really interesting... as there are simply too 
> many of them (something like half of the c64 stuff released in the last couple 
> of years =P)

Hmm I don't know, I see opposite: "ok, C ... well nice, but the real thing
would be assembly" :) I always seen (even as a C programmer) that it is
only something to make things easier and faster to develope, but the real
programs are in assembly. Especially on a 6502 where humans write better
code than a machine can generate: a modern RISC CPU is often the opposite: a
computer can optimize better than a human can.
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Sun Dec 4 16:29:06 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2011-12-04 16:29:09 CET