Re: [cc65] sta zp,y doesn't give an error

Ouch! Yeah, thinking about it... for me its a Zero-page address. 
However, it is an absoulute address as well, so the assembler is right 
and I am wrong. :(

But that were some awesome fast replies from you guys :)


cheers,
   crt xl


PS:
  Is it possible to generate a labels-file without the "."?
I HAVE a tiny SED script to get rid of it, however, if someone uses 
Windows.... :)



On 06/24/2011 11:29 PM, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:38:50PM +0200, Daniel Pralle wrote:
>>   just found a "bug" in my code I was searching for 1h.
>> Instead of writing data to a buffer in the Zero-page it ended up
>> somewhere else. I used STA $30,y. The generated opcode was $99 (STA
>> abs,y). because STA ZP,y doesn't exist. Shouldn#t that be an error?
>
> Why do you think this is an error? The assembler did exactly what it was told.
> If you want zeropage addressing and nothing else, use something like
>
>          sta     z:$33,y
>
> in which case you would have got
>
>          Error: Illegal addressing mode
>
> Regards
>
>
>          Uz
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.