2011/05/09 0:31 Groepaz wrote: > On Sonntag 08 Mai 2011, you wrote: >> According to this listing, .sizeof(FOO)=2 and .sizeof(BAR)=0. And, if >> you uncomment the line "lda BAZ,x", ca65 causes an error: "Size of `BAZ' >> is unknown". Is this intended behavior? Or am I making a wrong use of >> .sizeof() ? > > what exactly do you expect the size of a label to be? IMHO the (correct) > result is always 2, for c64 at least :) I always expect 2 (about FOO, BAR, and BAZ). I understand that .sizeof() should be independent of newlines. And I got that listing with 2.13.2 and svn HEAD (r5023). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sun May 8 17:56:21 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2011-05-08 17:56:23 CEST