I'm very new to cc65/ca65, but I think the behavior of .sizeof() is strange. When I use .sizeof() against labels, it seems to return different values depending on newlines in source code. I wrote a tiny test code: FOO: .byte $00, $01 BAR: .byte $00 .byte $01 BAZ: .byte $00 .byte $01 .proc myproc lda #.sizeof(FOO) lda #.sizeof(BAR) ;lda BAZ, x lda #.sizeof(BAZ) .endproc I assembled this code with ca65 --listing, and I got this listing (I extracted only the part of "myproc"): 000006r 1 .proc myproc 000006r 1 A9 02 lda #.sizeof(FOO) 000008r 1 A9 00 lda #.sizeof(BAR) 00000Ar 1 ;lda BAZ, x 00000Ar 1 A9 00 lda #.sizeof(BAZ) 00000Cr 1 .endproc According to this listing, .sizeof(FOO)=2 and .sizeof(BAR)=0. And, if you uncomment the line "lda BAZ,x", ca65 causes an error: "Size of `BAZ' is unknown". Is this intended behavior? Or am I making a wrong use of .sizeof() ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sun May 8 17:26:33 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2011-05-08 17:26:36 CEST