Re: [cc65] Modules with self modifying code

On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 02:59:02PM +0100, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:02:17PM +0100, Johan Kotlinski wrote:
> > Please, don't add new stuff. There is already much more than enough :)
> 
> Ok, that's an intermediate result of 4:2 in favour of the RWCODE party, if
> I've counted correctly. Let's see what the score is after the finals:-)

:) :)

Anyway, I always had the feeling that segments can be and maybe "must be" as
much as possible, in the sense, that every different purposes should/can
have own segment: after all, segments belong to "layouts" (MEMORY {...}),
when there are only a few different kind, and what is more strictly follows
the 6502 convention: it's a need to have space for zero page, RAM/ROM
(depending the code), while the purpose (executable, non-executable,
data/code) can be expressed on a "higher abstraction level" which means
segments.  Segments though belongs to those layouts.  According to my logic,
this is the reason (also CODE/RODATA is separated too, which differ only in
"executable", so there is no logical to mix DATA/smc which differs in being
executable either - but it is already off-topic for now, I guess) that smc
should go into a separated segments, it's more "natural" and also fits into
the segment/layout model of cc65 suite perfectly.  IMHO/AFAIK/etc ...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.