On 08.02.11 21:40, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > Since RWCODE or something similar serves no real purpose besides a structural > one, and since existing self modifying code is in DATA without anyone > complaining for about 10 years, I've voted for DATA. But I'm not against a > separate segment, so if the majority is for RWCODE that is ok with me. I like the idea of RWCODE. 2cents, chris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed Feb 9 00:03:08 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2011-02-09 00:03:11 CET