Re: [cc65] Modules with self modifying code

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz1musoftware.de>
Date: 2011-02-06 20:36:01
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 12:19:14PM +0100, Christian Krüger wrote:
> When using different names for function that do the same thing, I
> see the problem, that the resulting linkage will become bloated.
> The start-up codes e.g. use _bzero(). When now using smc_memset(),
> we have in result an executable which contains the standard memset()
> as well as the smc_memset(). I regard this as waste of memory.

I agree with you on that. The problem is that option #3 is more work for me,
and more work for me could mean, that nothing happens because I don't find the
time to work on it. Also im Prinzip die Geschichte mit dem Spatz in der Hand
und der Taube auf dem Dach:-)

I would therefore still opt for #2. Moving from option #2 to #3 later is work,
but rather straightforward, and maybe someone volunteers for it.

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Sun Feb 6 20:36:09 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2011-02-06 20:36:11 CET