On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 12:19:14PM +0100, Christian Krüger wrote: > When using different names for function that do the same thing, I > see the problem, that the resulting linkage will become bloated. > The start-up codes e.g. use _bzero(). When now using smc_memset(), > we have in result an executable which contains the standard memset() > as well as the smc_memset(). I regard this as waste of memory. I agree with you on that. The problem is that option #3 is more work for me, and more work for me could mean, that nothing happens because I don't find the time to work on it. Also im Prinzip die Geschichte mit dem Spatz in der Hand und der Taube auf dem Dach:-) I would therefore still opt for #2. Moving from option #2 to #3 later is work, but rather straightforward, and maybe someone volunteers for it. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sun Feb 6 20:36:09 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2011-02-06 20:36:11 CET