Re: [cc65] Calling another program: exec() ?

From: Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc1web.de>
Date: 2011-01-25 20:50:43
Hi,

> Therefore, while it technically doesn't make much sense, it seems to be THE
> way to go, unless we want to shave off couple of bits off the
> implementation. I'd go for the typical, described above way, unless cutting
> the ret value can really save non-negligible amount of mem on some systems.
> And since you wrote that you didn't have issue with the -1 constant return,
> there it is - I guess ;-)

Exactly! Thanks for your summary - now I'm sure we're all on the same page :-)

Regards,
Oliver
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Tue Jan 25 20:51:02 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2011-01-25 20:51:04 CET