Hi Dave, >> 1. Write the function in assembler > > I tried using inline assembler, and it still got optimized out: The above meant non-inline assembler. Regarding inline assembler http://www.cc65.org/doc/cc65-9.html says: "Note: Inline assembler statements are subject to all optimizations done by the compiler. There is currently no way to protect an inline assembler statement from being moved or removed completely by the optimizer. If in doubt, check the generated assembler output, or disable optimizations." Regards, Oliver ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Mon Dec 6 16:58:59 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-12-06 16:59:02 CET