On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 06:17:03PM +0100, silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote: > I see ;-) If this is not easy to do (not sure how the parsing/ > executing is done, but probably not with getopt-alike) then we shall > have to live with that limitation. I thought the parsing could first > build a kind of table and then execute the entries. This would > remove all the order limitations, including the old ones for a > noticeably more friendly command line tools that require less time > to master. I didn't realize that the already existing dependency on command line order posed a problem. So please lets see if this is really a problem before spending time to fix it. I'm not against a change, but proposing one before anybody has even tried/tested the new stuff is a bit hasty in my eyes:-) Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Fri Nov 12 19:00:37 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-11-12 19:00:40 CET