Re: [cc65] CBM LFN Question

From: Payton Byrd <plbyrd1gmail.com>
Date: 2010-10-25 23:17:46
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Groepaz <groepaz@gmx.net> wrote:

>
> > Anyway: Having working opendir/readdir/closedir routines for the CBMs
> will
> > remove most needs to use CBM file I/O at all, so I see this as the
> > preferred way to get rid of the problem.
>
> i second that. generally using the cbm specific i/o functions should be
> optional (and not required like now), if the same can be achived through
> standard calls.
>
>
While it would take some refactoring of the existing code, CBM-Command could
benefit from this a LOT because it would make porting it to other platforms
much simpler.

One thing I think should be required is that the readdir attempt to get
extended directory attributes such as timestamps from drives that can
provide them.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Mon Oct 25 23:18:11 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-10-25 23:18:13 CEST