On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 09:11:19PM +0200, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > BTW: The cc65 runtime could get rid of all the LFN problems by just > "poking" the addresses at the right time. Of course, this would require > some direct calling into the KERNAL (instead of using the KERNAL jump > table) every now and then... Could you elaborate on this a bit? Do you mean just using one table entry and overwriting it with the necessary lfn info before each kernal call that needs an lfn? Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sun Oct 24 21:39:11 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-10-24 21:39:14 CEST