Hi! On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 11:03:34AM +0200, Oliver Schmidt wrote: > Maybe Uz felt that both approaches aren't "reliable" enough? Actually I had started to add an opendir implementation based on some code from Greg (I think), but this was never finished. I didn't want to use the code as is, because it didn't only implement directory routines, but also changed the way how units and directories were encoded in file names and maybe some things more. As long as you don't go for the whole world of incompatible extensions, an opendir implementation is not too complex (as one could see from the cbm_opendir implementation). Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sun Oct 24 18:07:46 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-10-24 18:07:48 CEST