Hi! On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:00:11PM +0200, Jakub wrote: > In this case one byte is wasted, while both functions could use the > same stack space. In bigger programs it can eat up to a few hunderd > bytes. What about computing graph of function calls and > automatically allocate same addresses for local variables of > function that do not call each other? There is no lack of ideas how to improve the compiler, but there's a lack of people implementing these ideas and a lack of spare time when it comes to me:-) So yes, you're right, that could be done. But it probably won't - at least not in the foreseeable future. Sorry. Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Tue Sep 14 08:27:24 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-09-14 08:27:27 CEST