On Monday 13 September 2010, Jakub wrote: > In this case one byte is wasted, while both functions could use the > same stack space. In bigger programs it can eat up to a few hunderd > bytes. What about computing graph of function calls and automatically > allocate same addresses for local variables of function that do not > call each other? Is this really a safe optimization? What about threads? Or when functions are called within an interrupt handler? Ciao, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch -- “When humans speak for God in terms of rejection or condemnation, we may rest assured that dangerously narrow minds are at work.” -- Rev. Webster "Kit" Howell ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-09-13 18:18:00 CEST