On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Payton Byrd <plbyrd@gmail.com> wrote: > After a lot of reading I've come up with the memory configuration that > makes most sense for what I'm doing, and it doesn't require any bank > switching. What I've done is load configuration 0E, which gives RAM from > 0000 to BFFF and leaves the ROMs and IO in place from C000 through FFFF. > When I configure the 128 in this way the program still works, but it just > doesn't seem to have effected the outcome which makes me believe that the > default C128 configuration used by ld65 is what's limiting the amount of RAM > available. > > So, what I could really use some help with is coming up with a memory > configuration for the 128 that takes advantage of all of the memory from > 0000 to BFFF being RAM. > > I just found http://www.cc65.org/doc/c128-3.html which essentially tells me this is exactly how cc65 configures the 128 by default, so I guess that's the reason I didn't see any change in my program's behavior after "configuring" the MMU. :) There doesn't appear to be any way to get more RAM available without bank switching. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed May 5 20:19:28 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-05-05 20:19:30 CEST