Hi! On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 05:47:39PM +0200, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > As I believe other people might have problems: Uz, is it worth to add a > work-around to the cbm I/O runtime library? I would say that depends on the complexity of the workaround. The code is shared among all platforms, even those without the bug, so adding code there will increase program size on all platforms. And the code must not be C64 specific. If a workaround is larger or platform specific, the routines will have to be made platform specific, which means they're more difficult to maintain. If you tell me what's needed to work around the problem, I can tell more ... Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sat May 1 18:02:17 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-05-01 18:02:19 CEST