On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 05:29:53PM +0200, silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote: > What would bother me more than the need to use the underscore is the perceived inconsistence: Prepending an underscore has been a common behaviour, even for very old C compilers. There are other ways to mangle the names (appending a $ or similar), but I don't know a single C compiler that doesn't change the identifiers when generating assembly. Which makes sense for the reasons explained by Oliver. > yet in C: > > extern void foo(void); > > or you get the error... ... which is no problem since you realize the error, fix the identifier and things work :-) Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Wed Apr 28 22:24:41 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-04-28 22:24:43 CEST