Hi, > I see But what if it is actually present in the system environment and valid? (e.g. because CC65 is installed in a non-default location)? I think it is OK not to force users who have it already present in the system, to reenter it here. I see. In general that can be archieved be using ?= . But I'm unsure if it makes too much sense here... > Yeah - thanks for the core job on that! Thanks :-) > Now only the asm dependencies... :-) Let's see if and what Uz comes up with... > I was thinking about "rm $(PROGRAM)* but I still didn't like it. I would be rather looking for a way to determine what is generated by various targets and remove only those, Not really feasable with at least somewhat reasonable effort (aka size of Makefile) from my perspective... > but when thinking more, I believe it could even delete every possible files, even if they are not generated in the current setup / with current options. Likely the best compromise... >> LDFLAGS = -m $@.map > Yup, I know. Then you are certainly far beyond the average Makefile author ;-) Regards, Oliver ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Mon Apr 26 17:04:16 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-04-26 17:04:18 CEST