On 2010-04-23, at 20:41, Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz@musoftware.de> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 03:17:20PM +0200, silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote: >> Would that be possible to add this option to ca65? My uneducated >> guess is that most of the code from cc65 could be reused there.. > > That's not true, but not a problem, since it is not much code, and > the list of > files is kept for other purposes already (they're written to the > object files). > > A more serious question is how to handle --create-dep on the cl65 > level? Without deeper thinking - the first what comes to my mind is that -- create-deps should generate them for both C and ASM files, which are not compiled C files. Thus the only smartness would be required to distinguish between "native" and "compiled" asm, which - I guess - shouldn't be too difficult. > The > simplest way would be to add something like --asm-create-dep, which is > explicitly passed to the assembler. But what if --create-dep is > specified when > assembling files with cl65? On the other side, cl65 could try to be > smart > (in fact, I could try to teach cl65 how to be smart :-), but often, > trying to > be smart doesn't work as expected :-) > I think I know what you mean ;-) -- SD! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Fri Apr 23 23:52:29 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-04-23 23:52:31 CEST