Hi Uz, > Ok, this is the reason for the "bug" (in your last mail). cl65 (as all other > tools) parse the command line from left to right. As soon as a file name is > reached, the corresponding subcommand is executed. So in your case, -o and its > argument are actually ignored. I see. Thanks for pointing out! If this isn't in the docs it deserves one of the first entries in the wiki... >> would translate to >> >> cc65 src/aaa.c -o obj/bbb.s >> ca65 obj/bbb.s -o obj/bbb.o >> >> for two reasons: >> >> 1. There would be no write access to the source directory (probably >> even readonly). >> 2. The potentially generated .u file would appear as obj/bbb.u >> (matching best the user's expectation). > > It's difficult for a tool to try to read the masters mind, and therefore I'm > not sure if not someone else would argue different. As long as sed-based post-processing of dependency files is necessary anyway I don't consider this too important... But anyway I'd like to hear those arguments - and answer them ;-) Regards, Oliver ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Apr 22 23:29:12 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-04-22 23:29:14 CEST