Re: [cc65] Re: some patches

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <uz1musoftware.de>
Date: 2010-03-17 18:08:16
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 05:56:06PM -0700, Aaron J. Grier wrote:
> I think it would be manageable if the patches were #ifdef'd or separated
> into separate source files.  already there is support for multiple
> targets: this would be adding support for sub-targets.

Please think again. Assume you have a set of replacement files that use self
modifying code. Then you get
                            
    c64 without self modifying code and without ide64
    c64 with    self modifying code and without ide64
    c64 without self modifying code and with    ide64
    c64 with    self modifying code and with    ide64

If someone requests support for conio using an 80 column driver. This results
in eight libraries: Each of the above with and without support for 80 columns.
And so on ...

Regards


        Uz


-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Wed Mar 17 18:08:29 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2010-03-17 18:08:31 CET