Hi, Comparing the current ?_ioctl () function declarations unsigned __fastcall__ tgi_ioctl (unsigned char code, unsigned val); unsigned char __fastcall__ ser_ioctl (unsigned char code, void* data); unsigned char __fastcall__ mouse_ioctl (unsigned char code, void* data); I'd vote for changing tgi_ioctl () to unsigned __fastcall__ tgi_ioctl (unsigned char code, void* data); for consistency reasons. Surely this is incompatible but we're changing quite some things about tgi anyway, don't we? Best, Oliver ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Fri Dec 11 10:17:52 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-12-11 10:17:55 CET