[cc65] IOCTLs

From: Oliver Schmidt <ol.sc1web.de>
Date: 2009-12-11 10:17:43
Hi,

Comparing the current ?_ioctl () function declarations

unsigned __fastcall__ tgi_ioctl (unsigned char code, unsigned val);
unsigned char __fastcall__ ser_ioctl (unsigned char code, void* data);
unsigned char __fastcall__ mouse_ioctl (unsigned char code, void* data);

I'd vote for changing tgi_ioctl () to

unsigned __fastcall__ tgi_ioctl (unsigned char code, void* data);

for consistency reasons. Surely this is incompatible but we're
changing quite some things about tgi anyway, don't we?

Best, Oliver
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Fri Dec 11 10:17:52 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-12-11 10:17:55 CET