Hi Uz, >> Thus, whenever RUN is used to start a compiled program, CLRCH(N) is not >> needed. This is true at least fo VIC-20 and C64. I expect any newer CBM >> machine to behave the same. > > Ok, thanks a lot! I will then remove the calls to CLRCH from all Commodore > targets. I seem to remember a recent discussion about startup code vs. "headers" in which producing a CBM file without the BASIC stub was a potential usecase. From that perspective it might be preferable to just comment-out the call with a notice that it is already done by the BASIC interpreter (thus serving as a hint to activate the call in a non-BASIC scenario). In case I totally missed the point - just ignore ;-) Best, Oliver ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:29:32 +0100
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-12-10 19:29:42 CET