Hello Uz, * On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 06:49:49PM +0200 Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 01:48:12PM +0200, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > > I see that http://www.cc65.org/bugs.php is not updated. Don't you plan > > to keep it up to date? > > I'm not decided about that. I've updated this page manually which is quite > some work. Since the 2.13 branch can now be tracked easily using subversion, > the page is not as important as before. Maybe I can implement something > automatic that accesses the repository. The problem with the current approach on SVN, as I see it, is as follows: The 2.13.0 branch not only contains bugfixes, but also other changes to 2.13.0. Until now, a release + the fixes was quite stable. Now, chances are that a 2.13.0 + svn might become much more unstable because other changes are getting into it, but not as much tested as an official release. Of course, the patch itself could be got from SVN, just give the revision numbers. Regards, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://opencbm.sf.net/ http://www.trikaliotis.net/ http://www.viceteam.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sun Oct 25 13:06:00 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-10-25 13:06:02 CET