On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 09:42:27PM +0200, Groepaz wrote: > the optimizer moves around small pieces of code, which means that often labels > will be referenced from a totally different place as before. the consequence > is that i need to tell the assembler somehow that this symbol exists, ie i > need to add the equivalent of a c prototype kindof. Why? For code labels, forwards should work without a problem. > mmh, since .global is already used, maybe you can add something > like .proto / .protozp that does this? or is there infact a way to achive > this with the existing stuff and i am just too dumb to read the docs? :) Maybe you can explain why there is a problem. If a label isn't know when it is encountered, the assembler assumes absolute addressing and fixes the correct value once it gets known. > and last not least as a teaser, this is from skoe's easyprog tool, compiled > with -O, and then run through the optimizer: > > result: 8563 bytes, old: 10711 (2148 saved, 20%) time:374s That sounds interesting! Regards Uz -- Ullrich von Bassewitz uz@musoftware.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sat Oct 24 20:43:31 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-10-24 20:43:33 CEST