Here are the results of a few tests: Apple //e -------------------------------------- INT FP MAF Aztec cc65 cc65 Benchmark BASIC BASIC Forth C 3.2 2.12 2.13 ========= ===== ===== ===== ===== ==== ==== pi (atan) ~40hr 1496 2180 1764 1514 e (euler) 670 559 501 NQ struct N/A N/A 16 2.98 1.93 1.33 NQ goto 37 55 N/A 2.93 1.54 1.32 Savage N/A 470 N/A 2664 N/A N/A NOTE: 1. All times reported in seconds unless otherwise noted. 2. N/A = Not Applicable. Environment does not natively support this benchmark. If you have problems with the formatting, use this URL: http://sense.net/~egan/perf2e.txt Observations: 1. The poor FP performance with Aztec C may be due to higher precision. 2. 2.13 is measurably faster than 2.12. 3. NQ struct/goto with 2.13 perform the same. Optimization improvements. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sun Oct 18 21:40:49 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-10-18 21:40:51 CEST