On Samstag 26 September 2009, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > The question is: to which extent do we want to support different or > especially broken firmware ROMs? If it's the main firmware that is broken, > we must support it, if possible. But what's with much less popular broken > firmware? A few lines of additional code is not much, but a few bytes here > and another few bytes there are more than a few bytes in total. From my own > ~10 C64 machines and/or boards, none has a -02 kernal. Is it really so > popular? it is... i'd say that maybe 20% of the c64s out there use the -O2 kernal. back in the days it was a popular sign of lameness when a crack didnt work on one or the other =P -- http://www.hitmen-console.org http://magicdisk.untergrund.net http://www.pokefinder.org http://ftp.pokefinder.org Die gute Unterhaltung besteht nicht darin, daß man selbst etwas Gescheites sagt, sondern daß man etwas Dummes anhoeren kann. <Willhelm Busch> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sat Sep 26 17:45:06 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-09-26 17:45:08 CEST