Re: [cc65] c64 kernal 02 vs. 03

From: Groepaz <>
Date: 2009-09-26 17:44:50
On Samstag 26 September 2009, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:

> The question is: to which extent do we want to support different or
> especially broken firmware ROMs? If it's the main firmware that is broken,
> we must support it, if possible. But what's with much less popular broken
> firmware? A few lines of additional code is not much, but a few bytes here
> and another few bytes there are more than a few bytes in total. From my own
> ~10 C64 machines and/or boards, none has a -02 kernal. Is it really so
> popular?

it is... i'd say that maybe 20% of the c64s out there use the -O2 kernal. back 
in the days it was a popular sign of lameness when a crack didnt work on one 
or the other =P


Die gute Unterhaltung besteht nicht darin, daß man selbst etwas Gescheites 
sagt, sondern daß man etwas Dummes anhoeren kann. 
<Willhelm Busch>

To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Sat Sep 26 17:45:06 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-09-26 17:45:08 CEST