Re: [cc65] library path

From: Groepaz <groepaz1gmx.net>
Date: 2009-09-26 10:50:22
On Samstag 26 September 2009, Chris McCormick wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 09:59:42AM +0200, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 08:40:12AM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
> > > Isn't that backwards? Makefiles typically remove object files,
> > > binaries and libraries with the "clean" target, and remove everything
> > > else (backup files, generated makefiles, etc) with "distclean".
> >
> > I don't know what makefiles do, but I've used "clean" and "zap" this way
> > since I'm writing makefiles - which is quite some time.
>
> That is 100% fine, but I think that the point is that most other people are
> used to 'clean' and 'distclean' doing what Per described and it could be
> confusing for people if 'make clean' does what 'make distclean' is
> generally supposed to do. So either we can teach everyone to adapt to your
> clean & zap, or we can just comply with the loose standard of clean &
> distclean. I think it's kind of obvious which tactic will cause more pain
> in the future.

i am using "clean" and "zap" too, probably not quite as long as Uz, but still 
for quite some years. "distclean" confuses the hell out of me!

:)

-- 

http://www.hitmen-console.org    http://magicdisk.untergrund.net
http://www.pokefinder.org        http://ftp.pokefinder.org

Da kam dann das Elfmeterschießen. Wir hatten alle die Hosen voll, aber bei mir 
lief's ganz flüssig. 
<Paul Breitner>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Sat Sep 26 10:50:32 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-09-26 10:50:34 CEST