Re: [cc65] library path

From: Groepaz <>
Date: 2009-09-26 10:50:22
On Samstag 26 September 2009, Chris McCormick wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 09:59:42AM +0200, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 08:40:12AM +0200, Per Olofsson wrote:
> > > Isn't that backwards? Makefiles typically remove object files,
> > > binaries and libraries with the "clean" target, and remove everything
> > > else (backup files, generated makefiles, etc) with "distclean".
> >
> > I don't know what makefiles do, but I've used "clean" and "zap" this way
> > since I'm writing makefiles - which is quite some time.
> That is 100% fine, but I think that the point is that most other people are
> used to 'clean' and 'distclean' doing what Per described and it could be
> confusing for people if 'make clean' does what 'make distclean' is
> generally supposed to do. So either we can teach everyone to adapt to your
> clean & zap, or we can just comply with the loose standard of clean &
> distclean. I think it's kind of obvious which tactic will cause more pain
> in the future.

i am using "clean" and "zap" too, probably not quite as long as Uz, but still 
for quite some years. "distclean" confuses the hell out of me!



Da kam dann das Elfmeterschießen. Wir hatten alle die Hosen voll, aber bei mir 
lief's ganz flüssig. 
<Paul Breitner>

To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Sat Sep 26 10:50:32 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-09-26 10:50:34 CEST