Re: [cc65] Secondary linker configurations

From: Groepaz <>
Date: 2009-09-25 12:13:32
On Freitag 25 September 2009, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:
> cc65 cannot be everything for everyone. Trying to integrate each and every
> user project into cc65 will make it unmaintainable in the long run. Once
> stuff is integrated into cc65, I'm the one who gets the complaints and will
> have to maintain it. As an example, see the discussion about the master
> makefile. I never wanted this thing, but people complain here if it doesn't
> work, and I have to spend my time discussing it and explain why it broke.

ofcourse, i understand that ... what i dont understand though is, why eg the 
runtime, the libc and the conio lib are not seperate libraries.... i cant see 
how that complicates things.

> offer a command file
> that takes the cc65 standard library for the platform and generates a copy
> by replacing the modules in question.

thats what i am doing now in almost all of my projects :)


Programmiersprachen die es einem nicht erlauben sich selber in den Fuss zu 
schiessen sind vor allem für die Programmierer geeignet die Gefahr laufen 
sich bei ihrem Tun selber zu verletzen.

To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Fri Sep 25 12:13:41 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-09-25 12:13:43 CEST