On Freitag 04 September 2009, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 08:50:02PM +0200, Groepaz wrote: > > however, using -Osir for the entire testsuite breaks something in the > > code that looks for the next test and loads it... how annoying =P so far > > i tracked it down to: > > > > while((mydirent=readdir(mydir))!=NULL) > > > > which always seems to fail > > Can you send me a piece of code that does not work, or just the compiled > assembly? I've checked just this snippet and the code it compiles to is ok. actually, it wasnt that... appearently making a local buffer in readdir() static fixed it - so the problem is probably related to that. i might try to come up with a little test for this later... :) i am working on fixing that issue now so that the testsuite can also run with -Osir - for what i have seen till now it seems that actually a few tests that fail without optimizations just work fine when optimizations are enabled. and some others break with them :=P will add some other option to the testsuite so i can build everything with and without optimizations and update the page... sometime later this morning =) > > (btw it would be really nice now to see the svn version in the --version > > output, its becoming confusing already... =D) > > Actually it does - provided that the sources are compiled from within an > svn working directory. Unfortunately, my nightly build script does not do > that, it compiles the sources from the source tree it packed into the > source archive before. So it's not that I'm not working on it ... i am always compiling from source... mmh, cant you copy the necessary file(s) into the source archive? -- http://www.hitmen-console.org http://magicdisk.untergrund.net http://www.pokefinder.org http://ftp.pokefinder.org If I had to live my life again, I'd make the same mistakes, only sooner. <Tallulah Bankhead> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Fri Sep 4 00:52:09 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-09-04 00:52:11 CEST