On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Groepaz<groepaz@gmx.net> wrote: > On Dienstag 01 September 2009, Per Olofsson wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Christian >> >> Krüger<Christian.Krueger@pace.de> wrote: >> >>can't see how that would help... it would still be a software stack, >> > >> > yes, but the high byte handling could be dropped... >> >> Does the compiler need to know about that? I mean, can't you just >> rewrite runtime/*.s to remove high byte handling, and link against >> that? > > afaik the compiler knows about certain things/functions in that respect so it > can emit better code in some cases. OK, so that would give you further gains, but if X is simply a "don't care" as far as the stack functions go, there should be no harm. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Tue Sep 1 15:32:38 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-09-01 15:32:40 CEST