Re: [cc65] bit-fields

From: <>
Date: 2009-08-30 20:58:21
On 2009-08-30, at 20:28, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote:

>> Sure - I shouldn't bother much about the uninitialised part of the
>> struct representation but am simply flagging that as it seems one  
>> byte
>> is differently handled than the other - it makes me suspicious and
>> possibly it might be worth checking for bugs there...
> As Groepaz has already pointed out, this is because the structure is
> uninitialized. Just initialize it my making it static or overlaying  
> a union.

Yes. I checked various combinations. So far seems to work fine.


To unsubscribe from the list send mail to with
the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.
Received on Sun Aug 30 20:58:29 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-08-30 20:58:31 CEST