On 2009-08-30, at 13:40, Groepaz wrote: >> >> Size of int = 2 >> Result = 00F2 >> >> Sure - I shouldn't bother much about the uninitialised part of the >> struct representation but am simply flagging that as it seems one >> byte >> is differently handled than the other - it makes me suspicious and >> possibly it might be worth checking for bugs there... > > probably coincedence - the local variable will be located on the > (software) > stack, and (if not initialized) the initial value will be more or > less random > because of that. > Quite possible. Accessing those bits seem to work ok. -- SD! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sun Aug 30 13:56:33 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-08-30 13:56:35 CEST