On 2009-08-30, at 11:25, Ullrich von Bassewitz wrote: > > Ok, the compiler can do bit-fields since yesterday. If anybody dares > to test > this feature, I would be glad about some feedback. > Looks like you did it! The emitted code seems also relatively compact. One thing that cought my attention: #include <stdio.h> void main(void) { struct foo { unsigned int bar0 : 1; unsigned int bar1 : 1; unsigned int bar2 : 1; unsigned int bar3 : 1; }; struct foo bars; bars.bar0 = 0; bars.bar1 = 1; bars.bar2 = 0; bars.bar3 = 0; printf("\nSize of int = %d", sizeof(int)); printf("\nResult = %04X\n", bars); } Gives: Size of int = 2 Result = 00F2 Sure - I shouldn't bother much about the uninitialised part of the struct representation but am simply flagging that as it seems one byte is differently handled than the other - it makes me suspicious and possibly it might be worth checking for bugs there... Regards, -- SD! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Sun Aug 30 13:31:32 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-08-30 13:31:34 CEST