Hi Uz, > I see your > problem. :-) > * There should be a compelling reason for a new major release. Maybe I'm > wrong, but I think, people expect that. Just "a few default behaviours > changed" is not really enough. I personally would consider the "integrated startup code" a release trigger. Just recall how many times you explained to a newbie in this list that he had forgotten to link in the startup code. It's just not the expected behaviour - therefore this change is a big one from the usability perspective. > While I do understand that testing is difficult > if there are incompatible changes, [...] You name it. Would it be an option to include the standalone startup code object files in the distribution although they're now part of the library? New makefiles / new users could ignore them while they would keep old makefiles working - wouldn't they? Best, Oliver Best, Oliver ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list send mail to majordomo@musoftware.de with the string "unsubscribe cc65" in the body(!) of the mail.Received on Thu Aug 20 22:40:28 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2009-08-20 22:40:30 CEST